Before
Project completion: Fri 17:00
Alice
- BuildFri 09:00–Fri 16:00
Ben
- ReviewFri 16:00–Fri 17:00
Hard deadline: Fri 17:00Tight headroom
MONDAY.COM / AVAILABLE CONNECTOR
Keep the board.
Understand the time.
Keep Monday.com where your work is managed. Use Can You Just to understand when that work can actually happen.
A linked item brings its business context with it. CYJ adds working calendars, estimated effort, priorities, dependencies and interruptions to calculate a forecast you can explain.
Follow a fictional linked-work example ↓Two deliberate directions.
- Monday.com → Can You JustRead selected items, source details and discovered sub-items.
- Plan and review in CYJChoose estimates, resources, dependencies and commitments locally.
- Can You Just → Monday.comPost supported authored updates and, when configured, assistance questions.
These arrows describe specific operations. CYJ does not automatically replace Monday.com dates, assignments or status with its forecast.
Connect the right boards. Choose the work.
An administrator configures a named organisation connection, saves a credential and selects the boards it can access. Work can be searched and linked to an existing project, or added as a new project with a planned stage.
The link retains the item’s identity, board and group, title, description, business status and safe source link. You supply CYJ’s estimated effort, resources, priority, prerequisites and dates. Those planning choices remain under local control.
Discover sub-items. Accept deliberately.
Refresh can discover Monday.com sub-items as stage suggestions. Review a suggestion before accepting it into the plan, assign resources and give it an estimate. Dismissed suggestions stay dismissed on refresh.
Refreshing source metadata is separate from scheduling acceptance. Accepted stage names and local planning choices are preserved. Unlinking a project retains its work and schedule.
Keep source context current where it matters.
Manual refresh reads the linked source again. For active linked execution, CYJ also monitors relevant source changes and checks freshness before offering or claiming agent work. Source changes can require attention without rewriting recorded actual effort or local scheduling overrides.
Checks depend on connection access and source availability. A missing item, disabled connection or delayed check is surfaced; cached information remains available. This is targeted refresh, rather than an instantaneous mirror of an entire board.
Updates have an author.
Recent item updates can be read from CYJ. To post an update, a person connects their own Monday.com credential and CYJ verifies the external identity and item access. An administrator may enter an update for a connected colleague; the text identifies both that colleague and the person entering it.
External identities can be mapped to CYJ team members, including people without a CYJ login. Mapping an identity does not create a personal credential or permission to post as that person.
Sending records an audit outcome. If Monday.com may have accepted an update but confirmation was lost, CYJ marks it unconfirmed and asks for reconciliation before another send. It does not silently retry an uncertain post.
A question can travel back to the work.
For supported linked agent work, a human assistance request can queue a question, review, approval or action on the source item using the sponsoring account’s existing personal connection. A reply in the correlated conversation can return as a response in CYJ.
Publication can be delayed while the local request remains valid. A received reply does not automatically resolve the blocker: the worker must evaluate it. This is a specific assistance workflow, not general comment synchronisation.
Explore the worker API →FICTIONAL LINKED-WORK STORY
The source stays the same. The forecast moves.
Imagine Alice’s build and Ben’s review below have been accepted from linked Monday.com work. The estimates, assignments and dependency have been set in CYJ. An urgent 45-minute request then uses Alice’s time.
The figures below come from the real CYJ scheduler using fixed fictional inputs. They demonstrate the scheduling consequence; this example does not contact Monday.com. The changed finish is visible in CYJ and can be explained in an authored update. No forecast date is automatically sent back.
A FICTIONAL SCHEDULING STORY
The 45-minute interruption
Before
Alice has seven hours of build work. Ben’s one-hour review waits for it. Friday’s 17:00 commitment fits.
The change
At 10:17, Alice commits a 45-minute request: ‘Can you just fix the customer export?’
After
Project completion: Fri 17:45
Alice
- BuildFri 09:00–Fri 10:17
- Interruption · Customer export fixFri 10:17–Fri 11:02
- BuildFri 11:02–Fri 16:45
Ben
- ReviewFri 16:45–Fri 17:45
Hard deadline: Fri 17:00Hard deadline threatened
Example assumptions. Friday 23 October 2026. Both people have a deliberately simple 09:00–18:00 calendar without breaks. The fix is committed work; actual effort has not been recorded.
THE CONSEQUENCE
The build now finishes at 16:45. Ben’s review moves with it, despite receiving no interruption.
THE REVISED PLAN
Completion is Friday 17:45. The 17:00 hard deadline stays fixed, so the forecast shows a threatened commitment.
The work has context. Now give it capacity.
Explore team scheduling ↗Compare forecasts with commitments →All integration concepts →Monday.com is named here to describe compatibility. Can You Just is a separate product; no endorsement or partnership is implied.
Register your interestComing in a later release · registration is not open yet