Can You Just

HOW CAN YOU JUST WORKS

You make a plan.
Real life interferes.
The plan adjusts.

Record what happened. See what moved. Understand why.

Can You Just is a planning application for teams whose project work competes with urgent requests. Its forecasts connect the work to the time available, so changes have visible consequences.

BUILD THE PLAN

Start with the work, and what it needs.

Create projects and stages. Estimate the effort, assign the resources and connect the dependencies. A review can wait for a build; a project can depend on another project finishing.

Set priorities and deadlines. A priority helps decide what gets capacity first; a deadline gives you a target against which to read the forecast. Neither makes the work take less time.

Explore the planning model →

MAKE CAPACITY REALISTIC

Eight hours in a day doesn’t mean eight hours free.

Working patterns, time away and fixed commitments determine when people can contribute. Shared stages need overlapping availability from their contributors.

Effort is working time, not elapsed time. An hour of work may finish tomorrow if today’s remaining capacity is already committed. The forecast respects those constraints rather than treating every calendar hour as available.

AI resources can sit in the same plan, with continuous availability and dependencies on human work. Can You Just represents their capacity; an external system performs their work.

Read about human and AI resources →

REAL LIFE HAPPENS

Record the request that changed the day.

Someone needs an urgent fix. A colleague asks for help. Record an interruption against the person doing it, with its timing and duration. Accepted or self-created interruptions reserve productive capacity that planned stages would otherwise use.

Keep changing estimates, progress and priorities as the work becomes clearer. The plan is useful when it reflects what is actually happening.

FOLLOW THE CONSEQUENCES

A delay doesn’t stop at the first person.

Can You Just recalculates the forecast around remaining capacity, prerequisites and shared resources. If Alice’s build finishes later, Ben’s review may start later too. A missed shared work window can carry the delay into another day.

The target deadline stays visible alongside the forecast. You can see whether the updated schedule is still achievable, rather than assuming the original date still holds.

See the fictional 45-minute interruption example →

MAKE A DELIBERATE CHOICE

Decide what should happen next.

Revisit priorities, resources or the scope and estimates recorded in the plan. Those choices still have to fit the available time and dependencies.

Use What If planning to explore a proposal and compare its effect before applying it. Keep the live plan as it is if the proposal doesn’t help.

KEEP THE EXPLANATION

Explain why the date moved.

Actual work history and forecast history help you understand the difference between what was planned and what happened. Interruptions become part of the explanation instead of disappearing into an apparently ordinary working day.

The forecast is an estimate based on recorded information, not a guarantee. Better estimates and timely updates make the explanation more useful.

THE MODEL, IN FIVE LINES

You make a plan.
Real life interferes.
Can You Just records what happened.
The plan adjusts.
You can see why the deadline moved.

Make the changes visible.

For teams balancing project commitments with the work nobody knew to plan for.

Back to the example ↗
Register your interestComing in a later release · registration is not open yet
Explore the existing Help centre →